Привет, Гость
Поиск пользователей
  Кто, Где, Когда
В онлайне
Online game О!
  Случайный дневник



Забыли пароль?

Получи свой дневник!

Дневник пользователя "nutader"

понедельник, 27 мая 2013 г.
The 2nd major contention within the commentary - its accusation that... nutader 19:30:16
 The 2nd major contention within the commentary - its accusation that giant Tobacco is behind the marketing of electrical cigarettes - can also be false. No current ecigarette companies - producers or entrepreneurs - are connected with tobacco companies. Really, they're competing directly with tobacco companies (and pharmaceutical companies) for profits.

Because of the novelty of people products along with the limited research on their own safety and effectiveness, you will find many space for healthy debate regarding the proper role for http://greenavis.co­m/ in quitting smoking strategy. However, that debate needs to be while using truth - on factual evidence - this can be this really is this is not on a "pack of lies."

Ama Unsure Smoking is Any Worse than Using Electric Cigarettes

In news reports release released Monday using the Ama (AMA), the key factor association within the nation's doctors known to as on eliminating electric cigarettes available on the market. The AMA adopted insurance coverage intended for "barring buying e-cigarettes that aren't Food and drug administration approved." Since these items aren't presently Food and drug administration approved, an insurance plan comes lower to have an immediate stop around buying electric cigarettes, effectively getting rid of the product available on the market.

An AMA representative stated: "Because e-cigarettes were not completely examined, one cannot conclude that they're less dangerous or less harmful than conventional cigarettes."

Enhanced Comfort within the Story

You cannot be serious. The Ama doesn't have sufficient information to manage to conclude that smoking cigarettes, which kills 100s of 1000's people people every year, is much more harmful when in comparison to some device which "provides nicotine for that user utilizing a vaporized propylene glycol solution" and which is not proven to guide to the disease, a far more compact amount dying among just one American.

It does not have a very rocket physician to manage to determine that breathing in nicotine and much more than 10,000 chemicals - including 60 cancer resulting in cancer leading to cancer causing carcinogens - is much more harmful than breathing in nicotine without people 10,000 plus chemicals and cancer resulting in cancer leading to cancer causing carcinogens. Really, the study the AMA news release refers - the Food and drug administration laboratory study - certifies that could be only trace amounts of cancer resulting in cancer leading to cancer causing carcinogens in ecigarette tubes, such as the amount found in nicotine alternative items.

When the Ama isn't convinced that http://greenavis.co­m/ electric cigarettes are safer than smoking, plus there's no way it should be convinced that using nicotine alternative treatments are safer than smoking. Ultimately, the amount of cancer resulting in cancer leading to cancer causing carcinogens within these 2 types of items are virtually identical. How could it be that nicotine alternative items pose a substantially lower cancer resulting in risk than smoking, while electric cigarettes don't, if both items offer the equivalent cancer resulting in cancer leading to cancer causing carcinogens?

More disturbing compared to AMA's apparent scientific mess is it's marketing insurance coverage that might cause severe injuries for the public's health. Banning electric cigarettes would pressure 1000's of vapers who've effectively stop smoking revisit cigarettes. The conclusion result? Elevated disease and dying. Why would the AMA do?

Most annoying, and dishonest, is the Ama - inside the news release - does not disclose its financial conflict appealing: its receipt of funding from pharmaceutical companies which manufacture quitting smoking medicines.

Дневник пользователя "nutader"

читай на форуме:
Сегодня ржач был!
шаг вперед
Хочешь аватарки и дизайны на заказ?...
пройди тесты:
Учиха, ты подлец!!!
читай в дневниках:

  Copyright © 2001—2018 BeOn
Авторами текстов, изображений и видео, размещённых на этой странице, являются пользователи сайта.
Задать вопрос.
Написать об ошибке.
Оставить предложения и комментарии.
Помощь в пополнении позитивок.
Сообщить о неприличных изображениях.
Информация для родителей.
Пишите нам на e-mail.
Разместить Рекламу.
If you would like to report an abuse of our service, such as a spam message, please contact us.
Если Вы хотите пожаловаться на содержимое этой страницы, пожалуйста, напишите нам.